試験の準備方法-便利なP_SAPEA_2023日本語版対策ガイド試験-信頼的なP_SAPEA_2023問題数

BONUS！！！ JPNTest P_SAPEA_2023ダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード：https://drive.google.com/open?id=10QUFnnoHt8-h4WZJ6G7MrqYoLBjFNbjH

この人材が多い社会で、人々はずっと自分の能力を高めていますが、世界で最先端のIT専門家に対する需要が継続的に拡大しています。ですから、SAPのP_SAPEA_2023認定試験に受かりたい人が多くなります。しかし、試験に受かるのは容易なことではないです。実は良いトレーニング資料を選んだら試験に合格することは不可能ではないです。JPNTestが提供したSAPのP_SAPEA_2023「SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect」試験トレーニング資料はあなたが試験に合格することを助けられます。JPNTestのトレーニング資料は大勢な受験生に証明されたもので、国際的に他のサイトをずっと先んじています。SAPのP_SAPEA_2023認定試験に合格したいのなら、JPNTestが提供したSAPのP_SAPEA_2023トレーニング資料をショッピングカートに入れましょう。

SAP P_SAPEA_2023 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック	出題範囲
トピック 1	SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework and toolset: The focal point of this topic is the company's business strategy. It also covers SAP Reference Architecture content, IT requirements, business requirements and (SAP) solution space, and SAP Enterprise Architecture-related artifacts.
トピック 2	Architecture vision and roadmap: It focuses on developing the architecture vision and roadmap for a company. The topic also covers existing and future business models and capabilities and target business solution architecture roadmap.
トピック 3	Business Architecture: The topic of business architecture discusses business capability mapping and end-to-end processes.
トピック 4	Application, Data, and Technical Architecture: This topic evaluates your knowledge about artifact content, stakeholders, best practices of SAP Reference Content, the SAP Integration Advisory Methodology, and SAP Clean Core principles and strategy.

>> P_SAPEA_2023日本語版対策ガイド <<

P_SAPEA_2023問題数、P_SAPEA_2023合格体験記

コンピュータ、ネットワーク、および半導体技術の急速な発展により、人々の市場はますます激しく争われています。証明書を取得するためにP_SAPEA_2023試験に合格すると、より良い仕事を探し、より高い給料を得ることができます。高品質の学習教材を見つけるのにうんざりしている場合は、P_SAPEA_2023試験準備を試すことをお勧めします。 P_SAPEA_2023試験の教材は、他の同じ学習製品よりも品質が高いだけでなく、P_SAPEA_2023試験に簡単に合格できることを保証できるためです。

SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect 認定 P_SAPEA_2023 試験問題 (Q15-Q20):

質問 # 15
You, as the Chief Enterprise Architect of Wanderlust GmbH, have been trying to formulate the Business Strategy Map. You are currently working on the strategic objective to "Increase supply reliability of Lithium batteries". Arrange the elements of the Business Strategy Map into the right order that shows the dependencies between these elements.

正解：

解説：

質問 # 16
Demand and Supply Planning (SAP IBP) implementation has been identified as a quick win, based on feedback from a large cross section of Wanderlust stakeholders. As the Chief Enterprise Architect, you have now been asked to scope and contextualize the architecture project. Architecture principles have already been adopted. Which of the following activities should you to initiate to conclude the Statement of Architecture Work for the intended SAP IBP implementation initiative? Note: There are 3 correct answers to this question.

A. Conduct a technical Proof of Concept to understand features and functionalities of SAP IBP.
B. Conduct a high-level Capability Assessment to identify areas of improvement (business and IT).
C. Conduct a Fit Gap Assessment to identify requirements that cannot be met
D. Define the Solution Context for the architecture work.
E. Outline the aspirational Solution Concept to address the stakeholders' needs and business requirements.

正解：C、D、E

解説：
The Statement of Architecture Work should encompass a Fit Gap Assessment to understand what requirements are currently not met by existing capabilities, the definition of the Solution Context to set the boundaries and scope of the architecture project, and the outline of the aspirational Solution Concept that encapsulates the stakeholders' needs and business requirements. These steps are vital in the preparatory phase to ensure that the architecture work is well-defined and targeted to deliver the anticipated outcomes.
Reference = These activities are part of standard enterprise architecture practices and are necessary to develop a comprehensive and actionable Statement of Architecture Work that guides the SAP IBP implementation initiative.

質問 # 17
For the next Architecture Board meeting, you need to determine the next steps required after the business, application/data and technology architecture designs have been created. What do you recommend?

A. Finalizing the Business, Application/Data, and Technology Architecture artifacts. Building an Architecture Roadmap. Creating a first draft of the Project/Rollout Project plan.
B. Establishing change management processes for the management of the business application/data and technology artifacts Handing over the artifacts to the implementation partner and rolling out the project
C. Reviewing Business Application/Data and Technology Architecture artifacts with stakeholders and signing off on first versions.Using Transition Architectures to build the Architecture Roadmap. Creating first drafts of the required work packages and the Project/Rollout plan.

正解：C

解説：
Explanation
According to the SAP Enterprise Architect framework, which is based on the TOGAF ADM, the next steps are:
Reviewing Business, Application/Data, and Technology Architecture artifacts with stakeholders and signing off on first versions. This step involves validating and verifying the architecture designs with the relevant stakeholders, such as business owners, users, developers, and vendors. The goal is to ensure that the architecture designs meet the requirements and expectations of the project, and to obtain formal approval for the first versions of the artifacts.
Using Transition Architectures to build the Architecture Roadmap. This step involves defining and prioritizing the Transition Architectures, which are intermediate states between the Baseline Architecture (the current situation) and the Target Architecture (the desired future state). The Transition Architectures describe how to move from one state to another in a feasible and manageable way, taking into account the constraints and dependencies of the project. The Architecture Roadmap is a document that outlines the sequence and timing of the Transition Architectures, as well as the deliverables, resources, and risks associated with each one.
Creating first drafts of the required work packages and the Project/Rollout plan. This step involves identifying and defining the work packages, which are units of work that can be assigned to a project team or a vendor for implementation. The work packages specify the scope, objectives, dependencies, assumptions, and acceptance criteria of each unit of work. The Project/Rollout plan is a document that describes how to execute and monitor the work packages, as well as how to manage the change management, quality assurance, and governance aspects of the project.
The other options (B and C) are not correct for the next steps required after the architecture designs have been created, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in the SAP Enterprise Architect framework.
For example:
Option B is not correct because it does not include reviewing and signing off on the first versions of the architecture artifacts with stakeholders, which is an important step to ensure alignment and agreement on the architecture designs. It also does not mention using Transition Architectures to build the Architecture Roadmap, which is a key step to define and prioritize the intermediate states between the Baseline and Target Architectures.
Option C is not correct because it does not follow the SAP Enterprise Architect framework at all. It suggests establishing change management processes for the management of the architecture artifacts, which is something that should be done earlier in the framework, not after creating the architecture designs. It also suggests handing over the artifacts to the implementation partner and rolling out the project, which is a premature and risky move that does not take into account the need for defining Transition Architectures, work packages, and Project/Rollout plan.
For more information on the SAP Enterprise Architect framework and its phases, you can refer to SAP Enterprise Architect | SAP Learning or SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect.

質問 # 18
Green Elk & Company is the world's leading manufacturer of agricultural and forestry machinery. The former company slogan "Elk always runs has recently been changed to Elk feeds the world". One of Green Elk's strategic goals is to increase its revenue in the emerging markets of China, India, and other parts of Asia by 80 % within three years. This requires a new business model that caters to significantly smaller farms with limited budgets. You are the Chief Enterprise Architect and the CIO asks you to assess the new business model for smaller farms with smaller budgets. Given the principle and statement, which of the following combinations of rationale and implication do you consider well-defined?

正解：A

解説：
The rationale and implication in this combination are well-defined because they both support the principle of using packaged solutions in a standard way. The rationale explains the benefits of using packaged solutions, while the implication outlines the steps that need to be taken to ensure that packaged solutions are used in a standard way.
According to the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework, which is a methodology and toolset by the German multinational software company SAP that helps enterprise architects define and implement an architecture strategy for their organizations, a principle is a general rule or guideline that expresses a fundamental value or belief, and that guides the design and implementation of the architecture. A principle consists of four elements: a name, a statement, a rationale, and an implication. The name is a short and memorable label that summarizes the principle. The statement is a concise and precise description of the principle. The rationale is an explanation of why the principle is important and beneficial for the organization. The implication is a description of the consequences or impacts of applying or not applying the principle.
The principle in option D is:
Name: Use packaged solutions, in a standard way.
Statement: Buy packaged solutions that support our business requirements and use them in a standard way.
Rationale: Process and solution will be simplified by using packaged software in a standard way. Adherence to standard will allow better maintenance and lower the total cost of ownership. Increase the capability to adopt technology innovation.
Implication: In case custom developments are required, adhere to defined best practices, standards, and guidelines (extensibility concept, side-by-side extensions). Reuse before buy, before build. Enable easier transition to the cloud in the future.
This combination of rationale and implication is well-defined because it clearly and logically explains the benefits and consequences of following or not following the principle. The rationale shows how using packaged solutions in a standard way can simplify the process and solution, reduce the cost and effort of maintenance, and increase the ability to adopt new technologies. The implication shows how custom developments should be minimized and standardized, how reuse should be preferred over buying or building new solutions, and how cloud readiness should be considered for future scalability.
The other options (A, B, C) are not correct for the combination of rationale and implication that is well-defined because they either mix up or confuse some of the elements of the principle. For example:
Option A is not correct because it mixes up the rationale and implication elements. The first sentence of the rationale ("Process and solution will be simplified by using packaged software in a standard way") is actually an implication of following the principle, not a reason for following it. The first sentence of the implication ("Reuse vendor and industry best practices, reference architectures and pre-delivered content") is actually a rationale for following the principle, not a consequence of following it.
Option B is not correct because it confuses the rationale and implication elements. The first sentence of the rationale ("In case custom developments are required, adhere to defined best practices, standards, and guidelines (extensibility concept, side-by-side extensions)") is actually an implication of following the principle, not a reason for following it. The first sentence of the implication ("Process and solution will be simplified by using packaged software in a standard way") is actually a rationale for following the principle, not a consequence of following it.
Option C is not correct because it confuses the rationale and implication elements. The second sentence of the rationale ("Adherence to standard will allow better maintenance and lower the total cost of ownership") is actually an implication of following the principle, not a reason for following it. The second sentence of the implication ("Reuse before buy, before build") is actually a rationale for following the principle, not a consequence of following it.

質問 # 19
Which integration styles does SAP's Integration Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) cover in general?

A. Cloud2Cloud/Cloud2OnPremise/Cloud2Cloud/User2On Premise/User2Cloud/Thing2On Premise/Thing2Cloud
B. Ul Integration/Process Integration/Data Integration/Thing Integration.
C. Process Integration/Data Integration/Analytics Integration/User Integration/Thing Integration.

正解：C

解説：
The Integration Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) is a framework that helps organizations to design, build, and manage their integration landscape. ISA-M covers a wide range of integration styles, including:
Process Integration: This style of integration involves the integration of business processes across different systems and applications.
Data Integration: This style of integration involves the integration of data from different sources into a single data repository.
Analytics Integration: This style of integration involves the integration of data from different sources for the purpose of analytics.
User Integration: This style of integration involves the integration of user interfaces from different systems and applications.
Thing Integration: This style of integration involves the integration of things, such as sensors and actuators, with other systems and applications.
ISA-M also includes a number of other integration styles, such as event-driven integration, service-oriented integration, and enterprise application integration.
By covering a wide range of integration styles, ISA-M provides organizations with a flexible framework that can be used to meet their specific integration needs.
SAP's Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) is a framework that helps enterprise architects to define and execute an integration strategy for their organization. ISA-M covers five integration styles that represent different aspects of integration in a hybrid landscape. These integration styles are3:
Process Integration: This integration style enables end-to-end business processes across different applications and systems, such as SAP S/4HANA, SAP SuccessFactors, or third-party solutions. Process integration typically involves orchestrating or choreographing multiple services or APIs to achieve a business outcome.
Data Integration: This integration style enables data exchange and synchronization between different data sources and targets, such as SAP HANA, SAP Data Warehouse Cloud, or third-party databases. Data integration typically involves extracting, transforming, and loading (ETL) data to support analytical or operational scenarios.
Analytics Integration: This integration style enables data visualization and exploration across different data sources and targets, such as SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BusinessObjects BI Platform, or third-party tools. Analytics integration typically involves creating dashboards, reports, or stories to provide insights and recommendations for decision making.
User Integration: This integration style enables user interaction and collaboration across different applications and systems, such as SAP Fiori Launchpad, SAP Jam, or third-party portals. User integration typically involves creating consistent and seamless user experiences that integrate multiple UI technologies and frameworks.
Thing Integration: This integration style enables device connectivity and management across different applications and systems, such as SAP IoT, SAP Edge Services, or third-party platforms. Thing integration typically involves connecting physical devices or sensors to the cloud or the edge and enabling data ingestion, processing, and action.
Verified Reference: 3: https://help.sap.com/docs/btp/architecture-and-development-guide-for-industry-cloud-solutions/runtimes-environments-and-programming-models

質問 # 20
......

当社のP_SAPEA_2023ガイド急流を購入するすべての顧客情報は、外部に対して機密情報です。当社から漏洩したプライバシー情報について心配する必要はありません。あなたの名前、電子メール、電話番号で連絡できる人はすべて社内のメンバーです。お客様から提供されたプライバシー情報は、オンラインサポートサービスでのみ使用でき、専門スタッフによるリモートアシスタンスを提供できます。当社の専門家は、毎日P_SAPEA_2023試験問題の更新を確認し、お客様に常に情報を提供しています。 P_SAPEA_2023テストガイドについて質問がある場合は、オンラインでメールまたはお問い合わせください。

P_SAPEA_2023問題数: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/P_SAPEA_2023-mondaishu

さらに、JPNTest P_SAPEA_2023ダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=10QUFnnoHt8-h4WZJ6G7MrqYoLBjFNbjH

Ethan Collins Ethan Collins

Biography

試験の準備方法-便利なP_SAPEA_2023日本語版対策ガイド試験-信頼的なP_SAPEA_2023問題数

SAP P_SAPEA_2023 認定試験の出題範囲：

P_SAPEA_2023問題数、P_SAPEA_2023合格体験記

SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect 認定 P_SAPEA_2023 試験問題 (Q15-Q20):

Our Newsletter